Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. v. Cosme-Perez
as 3:2016cv01941
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc.
Defendant:
Noemi Cosme-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. 4JLJ, LLC

as 2:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edwards, Francisco Gutierrez, Humberto J Morales and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tarango Jr.
Defendant:
4JLJ, LLC doing business as J4 Oilfield Services and John Jalufka
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Galeas Jr. et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03047
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr., Josh Brown, Robert William Gallant and others
Defendant:
United States of America, State of North Carolina, County of Pasquotank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez-Zamora et al v. Los Matas Mexican Restaurant Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez-Zamora , Casey Van Dorl , Maria Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Los Matas Mexican Restaurant Inc., El Mezcalito, Inc., El Mezcal Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Peters-El et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03293
Plaintiff:
Travis Peters-El, Jorge Galeas Jr., Jose J. Moreno and others
Defendant:
United States of America, State of North Carolina, Pasquotank County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosme-Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv06665
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cosme-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Cosme-Perez
as 3:2010cv02249
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Noemi Cosme-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cosme-Perez et al v. Municipality of Juana Diaz et al
as 3:2007cv01942
Plaintiff:
Higinia Cosme-Perez, Felix Flores-Flores and Conjugal Partnership Flores-Cosme
Defendant:
Municipality of Juana Diaz, Ramon A. Hernandez-Torres, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.