Cases
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant: Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03080
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Defendant: EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: HON. JOSEPH A. DICKSON
Plaintiff: THE STATE OF MONTANA, EX. REL., THE STATE OF KANSAS EX. REL., TIMOTHY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03916
Plaintiff: CITY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY and COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Monmouth, New Jersey v. Florida Cancer Specialists, P.L. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00201
Plaintiff: County of Monmouth, New Jersey
Defendant: Florida Cancer Specialists, P.L. and William N. Harwin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
ARROYO v. BARHAM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv04195
Plaintiff: DELIRIS V. ARROYO
Defendant: WILLIAM BARHAM, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?