Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PARKER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY PARKER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, WARDEN, RIDGEWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Knight et al
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Courtney Parker
Defendant:
Wendy Knight, Warden, Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16820
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anglin et al v. Edgewell Personal Care Company et al
as 4:2018cv00639
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Anglin , Colleen Gorman , Paul Lambrakis and others
Defendant:
Edgewell Personal Care Company, Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC, Edgewell Personal Care LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sykes v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sykes
Defendant:
Courtney Parker and Pluto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00488
Petitioner:
Courtney Parker
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00129
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Margaret Pennie, Frank Quiniero, William J. Manas, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hanks, Patrick ONeal Jackson, Chester Jackson and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc. and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
More et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kei Amber More, Latasha Moore, Lester S. Moore and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
