Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hoglund et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Craig Douglas Hoglund and Christine Joan Hoglund
Defendant:
United States of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Craig Allen v. City of Citrus Heights Police, et al
as 22-15030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG DOUGLAS ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENTD, MEDIA-LAB, MATT JACOBS and others
(PS) Allen v. City of Citrus Heights Police Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv01853
Defendant:
Media-Lab, Matt Jacobs and City of Citrus Heights Police Department
Plaintiff:
Craig Douglas Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckstein v. Sonoco Products Company
as 7:2020cv00435
Defendant:
Sonoco Products Company
Plaintiff:
Craig Douglas Eckstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoglund et al v. Kautter et al
as 1:2018cv00189
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Dana (Hill) Fairchild, David J. Kautter and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Joan Hoglund and Craig Douglas Hoglund
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Cooper v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00076
Petitioner:
Craig Douglas Cooper
Respondent:
J. V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In Re Release of Seized Property
as 3:2015cv02818
Movant:
Craig Douglas Watson , Melissa Joanne Harvey and Frosty Farms Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983
USA v. Craig Near
as 15-15590
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRAIG D. NEAR, a.k.a. Craig Douglas Near and GENZIKO, INC.
Douglas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv02605
Plaintiff:
Craig Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anapol v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07003
Plaintiff:
Craig Douglas Anapol
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
