Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Craig Cunningham v. Technologic USA, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Technologic USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cunningham v. Technologic USA Inc
as 3:2022mc80293
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Technologic USA Inc
Craig Cunningham v. Technologic USA, Inc.
as 2:2022ms00057
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Technologic USA, Inc.
Craig Cunningham v. Technologic USA, Inc.
as 5:2022mc00006
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Technologic USA, Inc.
Craig Cunningham v. The Litigation Practices Group, PC et al
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
The Litigation Practices Group, PC, Daniel S. March, United Debt Consultants, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Craig Cunningham v. Michael Montes et al
as 8:2021cv01888
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Petitioner:
James Sheldon
Defendant:
Michael Montes, Jr. and Tollfreezone.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craig Cunningham v. Michael Montes et al
as 8:2021mc00027
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Michael Montes, Jr. and Tollfreezone.com, Inc.
IN RE: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02295
Plaintiff:
Inna Badran, Morris Padulo, Chenelle McCall and others
Defendant:
PRA Group, Inc., Neal Stern, Cynthia Patterson and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America and Avaya Inc.
Petitioner:
Sharina Talbot Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craig Cunningham v. Juice Supply Company et al
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Juice Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Craig Cunningham v. Matrix Financial Services, LLC
as 8:2020mc00065
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Matrix Financial Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
