Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Williams v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Kentrall Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center and Scott Ellington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw-Reed v. Bowers et al
as 4:2017cv00841
Plaintiff:
Calbert Shaw-Reed
Defendant:
Keith Bowers and Craighead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Roy Bernard Flowers
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center and T Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Boyd et al
as 3:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
William Neal Toney
Defendant:
Marty Boyd and Craighead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
J C Payne, II
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center, Hogan, Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willison v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Raymond D Willison
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center and K Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lockhart
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center and David P Chadwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Matthew Shipman
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center, K Bowers and Mitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Terry Dodson
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center and Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Boyd et al
as 3:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
Michael A Adams
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Craighead County Detention Center, Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
