Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Euell v. Bowers et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
Edward Earl Euell
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center, T Raymond, Keith Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bowers et al
as 3:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Marshall Irvin Williams
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center, T Raymond, Keith Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweat v. Does
as 4:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Does Medical, Provider, Staff, Craighead County Detention Center, Black, Becker and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Sweat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Poinsett County Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Doe, Poinsett County Detention Center, K Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Davanta Iverson
Defendant:
E Stanfield and Craighead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Defendant:
E Stanfield and Craighead County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Laquincy Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougal v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
Anthony McDougal, Jr
Defendant:
E Stanfield and Craighead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friar v. Bowers et al
as 3:2018cv00190
Defendant:
Does Casey, Sherry, Rayanne, Kara Black, Sandy Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Lorri Friar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Boyde et al
as 4:2018cv00638
Defendant:
Marty Boyde, Herald Perrin, Black and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Shawgnessy Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Craighead County Detention Center
as 3:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Roger Mitchell
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center, Marty Boyde, Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
