Cases 1 - 10 of 493
Franklin v. Natchez Auto Ventures II, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tamika Franklin
Defendant:
Natchez Auto Ventures II, LLC and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clarke v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 0:2023cv60896
Plaintiff:
Julius Erving Clarke
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Robinson-Simms v. Best Deal Auto Sales, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Abdus-Samad Hakim Robinson-Simms
Defendant:
Best Deal Auto Sales, LLC and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Shelby Jones, Scott Weaver and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fd Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
