Cases 1 - 10 of 60
DeAndre Harris v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1060
Petitioner:
DEANDRE HARRIS
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Robert Pann v. Brian Hadden, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PANN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HADDEN, KAYLA JOHNSON, K. CHAUVEZ and others
Haley v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Melissa A. Haley
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Coffee Creek Correctional Facility and Vendor ICSolutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv11872
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lewis Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Michigan Correctional Facility and Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Pann #254048 v. Hadden et al
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert Pann #254048
Defendant:
B. Hadden, K. Johnson, K. Chauvez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aracely Hernandez v. Paula Myers
as 21-36041
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARACELY HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
PAULA MYERS, Superintendent Coffee Creek Correctional Facility
Marisol Ruiz v. Nancy Howton, et al
as 21-35419
Respondent / Appellee:
NANCY HOWTON, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARISOL RUIZ
Respondent:
COFFEE CREEK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Robert Swint v. Oregon State Hospital, et al
as 21-35375
Defendant / Appellee:
AM BEST, AMTRAK, 62 BILLION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Swint v. Oregon State Mental Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Spacex, State of Oregon, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
