Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Goad v. Gentry et al
as 5:2021cv00462
Defendant:
Matt Gentry, Lt Baleew, Cullman County Detention Center Medical Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Goad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goad v. Cullman County Detention Center et al
as 5:2020cv01716
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center, Lt Baleew, Deputy Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haag v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2019cv01055
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Haag
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niblett v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven Scott Niblett
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Alexander Berryhill
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunson v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv01740
Plaintiff:
Carlton Evan Dunson
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunson v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv01739
Respondent:
Cullman County Detention Center and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Carlton Evan Dunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cloud v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn Cloud
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center, Matt Gentry, Floyd Lee and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloud v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn Cloud
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center, Matt Gentry, Floyd Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2017cv01660
Plaintiff:
Brad Dewyane Garland
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
