Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mantis Communications, LLC v. Culver Franchising System, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Mantis Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Culver Franchising System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JONES et al v. CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2016cv01917
Defendant:
Culver Franchising System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jones, WILBERN ENTERPRISES, LLC, MBAJ GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Culver Franchising System, Inc. v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Culver Franchising System, Inc.
Defendant:
Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party:
DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner:
XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
Jones et al v. Culver Franchising System, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03269
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones , MBAJ Group, LLC , Michael Anthony G. Wilbern and others
Defendant:
Culver Franchising System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. , ABP Corporation , Bojangle's Restaurants Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Doctor's Associates Inc , Kraft Foods Inc. and Rodale, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
