Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)(2) - (s)(h) -- Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Carmel Capital LLC v. Frankly Media LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01593
Defendant:
WPAP-KSCS Radio Group Ltd, Frankly Media LLC, KLIF Radio and others
Plaintiff:
Carmel Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nettlebeck v. Cumulus Media Inc.
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Justin Nettlebeck
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Dean et al v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Demarland Dean, Kimberly Van Decreek, Bradley Kirk and others
Defendant:
Cumulus Media, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. Cumulus Media Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05196
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
McGlynn v. Cumulus Media, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05194
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Cumulus Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cumulus Media Inc v. Williamson et al
as 2:2020cv13379
Defendant:
Woodward Sports Network LLC and Ms Kristina Williamson
Plaintiff:
Cumulus Media Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cumulus Media Inc v. Williamson et al
as 2:2020cv13378
Defendant:
Woodward Sports LLC and Ms Kristina Williamson
Plaintiff:
Cumulus Media Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.