Cases 1 - 10 of 83
United States of America v. Premier Property Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currie Lee Byrd
Garnishee:
Premier Property Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Hawkins v. Carpenter, Jr et al
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Ron Carpenter, Jr, Lylod Curry Brasfield and Cornelius Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01305
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Wardlow
as 1:2023cv01122
Petitioner:
Stacy Curry
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rucker et al v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Tikeila Rucker, Rachael Spriggs, Damon Curry-Morris and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Carolyn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01074
Petitioner:
Devonta Curry
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Wright et al
as 2:2022cv02674
Plaintiff:
Joseph Currie
Defendant:
Lorenzo Wright and United States of America doing business as United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Curry v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Martez Darrell Curry
Defendant:
Karl Jackson, Kent Treece, FNU Kissell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
