Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Peter Watkins
as 21-1241
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER ARTHUR WATKINS, aka Peter Arthur Curtis-Watkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2020at01156
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney, CEP - America - California DBA Vituity Hospitalists and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2020cv02334
Defendant:
Ashley Joel Pilgrim, City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38826
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2019cv01086
Defendant:
Adaris Wilson, City of Roseville, Curtis Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Sanchez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Curtis Watkin
as 14-4342
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS WATKINS
Melear v. Logan County Kentucky et al
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles Melear
Defendant:
Logan County Kentucky , Logan Chick , Loyd Houchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Logan County Kentucky et al
as 1:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Farmer and Marjorie Farmer
Defendant:
Logan County Kentucky, Logan Chick, Loyd Houchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 3:2007cv01246
Plaintiff:
Darryle Jerome Banks
Defendant:
Metropolitan Police Department, Chad Bereth, (f/n/u) Simleck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 3:2007mc00078
Plaintiff:
Darryle Jerome Banks
Defendant:
Metropolitan Police Department, Chad Bereth, (f/n/u) Simleck and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
