Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Alphonso Haynesworth v. SC Dept of Mental Health
as 18-6295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, SVPTP, KIMBERLY POHOLCHUK, CYNTHIA HELFF and others
Danao v. Poholchuk et al
as 0:2017cv02853
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Danao
Defendant:
Kimberly Poholchuk and Cynthia Helff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 2:2016cv03623
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health , Kimberly Poholchuk , Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Magill et al
as 1:2016cv03362
Defendant:
John Magill, Versie J. Bellamy, Holley Scaturo and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Shane Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred LaSure v. SC Mental Health
as 16-7338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED LASURE
Defendant - Appellee:
SC MENTAL HEALTH, CYNTHIA HELFF, Program Director, Individually and in her Official Capacity and JOHN MCGILL, State Director, In his Official and Individual Capacity
Bates v. Goodstein et al
as 4:2016cv02837
Plaintiff:
Dennie Roger Bates
Defendant:
Diane S Goodstein, Dr Hedgepath, Holly Scaturo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Scaturo et al
as 4:2016cv02466
Plaintiff:
Calvin Joe Miller
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuk, Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitcraft v. Scaturo et al
as 5:2016cv02385
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Whitcraft
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuk, Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geter v. Scaturo et al
as 8:2016cv02345
Plaintiff:
Timothy Geter
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuk, Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danao v. Scaturo et al
as 0:2016cv02315
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Danao
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuk, Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
