Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Watson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Petitioner:
Cynthia Watson and Cynthia Joann Watson
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Adam C Driggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 w
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baranowski v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 6:2019cv01960
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Watson Baranowski
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Deutsche Bank Natl Trust Co. v. Cynthia Watson, et al
as 16-51375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-C, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates
Defendant - Appellant:
CYNTHIA WATSON and RICHARD WATSON
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Watson et al
as 1:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Cynthia Watson and Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Watson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Watson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson et al v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mark Watson doing business as The Ink Dot and Cynthia Watson
Defendant:
Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
