Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Race v. Montana State Prison Infirmary, et al.
as 24-38
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL SIDNEY RACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA STATE PRISON INFIRMARY, PAUL REES, Dr. NEUMEISTER and others
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 23-4077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Petersen v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Petersen
Defendant:
Brian M. Gootkin, Cynthia Wolken, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Woofter et al
as 6:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
John O. Miller
Defendant:
Melissa Woofter, Bowman Smelko, Steffani Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreves v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Crystal Thompson, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NezPerce v. Reich et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Defendant:
Billie Reich, Jim Salmonsen, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perfetto v. FNU Harmon et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Perfetto
Defendant:
FNU Harmon, John/Jane Doe Director of Nursing, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makueeyapee Whitford v. Reginald Michael, et al
as 22-35526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAKUEEYAPEE D. WHITFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINALD D. MICHAEL, CYNTHIA WOLKEN, JIM SALMONSEN and others
NezPerce v. Wolken et al
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Defendant:
Cynthia Wolken, Jim Salmonsen and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
