Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Daniels v. Correction Officer #1 John Doe et al
as 9:2020cv00888
Defendant:
Correction Officer #1 John Doe, Great Meadow Staff Nurse: Jane Doe, Correction Officer #2 John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. D. Daniels Contracting Ltd. et al
as 2:2019cv03590
Defendant:
D. Daniels Contracting Ltd. and David Daniels
Plaintiff:
Kenny Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. Graham et al
as 6:2018cv06361
Plaintiff:
Nelson Rodriguez
Defendant:
Harold D Graham, Eric T. Schniederman, Ray A. Kyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIEL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv01661
Plaintiff:
ALTAMESE D. DANIEL
Defendant:
NANCY A BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Mena et al v. Daniels et al
as 1:2017cv06798
Defendant:
D. Daniels Contracting Ltd. d/b/a Daniels Sanitation and David E. Daniels
Plaintiff:
Damon Greenridge and Carlos Mena
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mena et al v. D. Daniels Contracting Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv06798
Defendant:
D. Daniels Contracting Ltd. and David E. Daniels
Plaintiff:
Damon Greenridge and Carlos Mena
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simons et al v. D. Daniels Contracting LTD. et al
as 2:2015cv06010
Defendant:
D. Daniels Contracting LTD. and David E. Daniels
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hunter, Kevin Priest and Anthony Simons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
