Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Ray Hurt v. All Corrections Officers
as 21-6427
Defendant / Appellee:
ALL CORRECTION OFFICIALS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND D. HURT
(PC) Rood v. Lockwood et al
as 2:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Isaac Lockwood, Z. Jurkiewicz, Najera and others
Plaintiff:
Colton James Rood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Apt. 1E Building Superintendent et al
as 1:2019cv01637
Defendant:
Apt. 2A V. Davis, Apt. 1E Building Superintendent, Apt. 4D Vacant and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. University of Detroit Mercy et al
as 2:2016cv13752
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Robinson
Defendant:
University of Detroit Mercy, Michael P Dosch, Andrea Teitel and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Hurt v. Fourth Circuit Court of Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv02506
Plaintiff:
Ray D. Hurt
Defendant:
Fourth Circuit Court of Maryland and District Court of Maryland-Greenbelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00179
Petitioner:
Jewel D. Hurt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Courtney Hurt v. Drug Asset Forfeiture Agency, et al
as 15-2631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY D. HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
DRUG ASSET FORFEITURE AGENCY and FORD COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY
Raymond Hurt v. White
as 15-6571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND D. HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITE, Case Manager, North Branch C.I., BITTINGER, Case Manager, Western Correctional Inst., MILLER, Lieutenant, North Branch C.I. and others
Hurt v. Rounds et al
as 8:2015cv00596
Plaintiff:
Ray D. Hurt
Defendant:
Rounds, Iams, Shift Commander "Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Madigan et al
as 2:2014cv02229
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Hurt
Defendant:
Dan Madigan, Willmore, Champaign County Sheriff, Champaign ILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
