Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Willis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
Clarence D. Willis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Willis
as 1:2017cv00080
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Jimmy D. Willis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Alexander et al v. Linthicum et al
as 7:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Darrold L Alexander and Marcus S Rhodes
Defendant:
Phyllis McWhorter, Tommy L. Norwood, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Murray et al
as 7:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Moses, Sr
Defendant:
Leonard S Murray, Lisa S James, Robert B Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Fay Servicing, LLC
as 4:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Donald D Willis
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Potter, Richard E. Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Chase Home Finance
as 4:2013cv00387
Petitioner:
Donald D Willis
Respondent:
Chase Home Finance , E M C and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rodick v. Smith County, et al
as 6:2012cv00575
Plaintiff:
Howard Rodick
Defendant:
Smith County, Smith County Sherriff's Office, Smith County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodick v. Smith County, et al
as 4:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
Howard Rodick
Defendant:
Smith County, Smith County Sherriff's Office, Smith County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Donald D Willis
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC and Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
