Cases 1 - 10 of 1,012
James D. Lewis v. Executive Committee of the United States District
as 25-1744
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Lewis v. King et al
as 6:2025cv00129
Plaintiff:
Darious D Lewis
Defendant:
Donna King, LT Geneva E Robinson and Karmen Ronnebaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Walters et al
as 2:2025cv00127
Plaintiff:
Llewellyn D. Lewis
Defendant:
Keith Walters and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Foster et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2025cv00712
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster, Affice Jackson, Richard Trickle and others
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Harris, Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Meyers v. Meyer et al
as 7:2024cv00857
Defendant:
T. Meyer, Kyle Rosch, C. Holdren and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2024cv05190
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SPAGNOLETTI and CO1 DAVID ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
ANDRE D. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv01567
Petitioner:
Alvin D. Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. Atlantic Bulk Carrier Corporation
as 3:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Lewis
Defendant:
Atlantic Bulk Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Lewis v. Mar-a-Lago et al
as 9:2024cv81001
Plaintiff:
James D. Lewis and James Obama
Defendant:
Mar-a-Lago, State of Palestine, J. D. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
