Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Murphy v. Brun
as 2:2025cv00031
Petitioner:
Ricky D. Murphy
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guthrie v. Murphy
as 2:2025cv00256
Plaintiff:
Dale Edward Guthrie
Defendant:
Benita D. Murphy, Edward E. Wooten, Elizabeth K. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Murphy v. Methode Electronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01213
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Murphy
Defendant:
Methode Electronics, Inc., Mark D. Schwabero, David P. Blom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MANNING v. MURPHY
as 2:2024cv10445
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MANNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Ivey, et al
as 24-8031
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. DUNLEAVY, RONALD D. DESANTIS, BRIAN KEMP and others
Petitioner:
LARRY DONNELL FORD
Hall et al v. May et al
as 1:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Jacoy Deshields, Murray Hall, III, Floyd Smith and others
Defendant:
Robert May, Philip Parker and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Murphy v. Sacramento County Court
as 2:2024cv01978
Respondent:
Sacramento County Court
Petitioner:
LaDarius D. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy
as 5:2024cv04281
Respondent:
Sacramento County Court
Petitioner:
LaDarius D Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henton v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Danielle Henton
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Crystal D. Murphy and Michael Peeples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
