Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Brewer v. Crabtree et al
as 6:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Stephen D Brewer
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Johnson v. Brewer
as 2:2023cv01934
Petitioner:
Darrell Johnson
Respondent:
D. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Martinez v. D. Brewer
as 2:2023cv00707
Petitioner:
Ramon Martinez
Respondent:
D. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brewer v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Brewer
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, J. Bailey, f/n/u Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Dugger v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv02142
Petitioner:
Timothy Dugger
Respondent:
D. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brewer v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Darron D Brewer
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, . Brown, . Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scollard v. Stafford Creek Corrections Center et al
as 3:2022cv05851
Plaintiff:
Devon J Scollard
Defendant:
Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Cheryl Strange, Barry DeHaven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv05203
Plaintiff:
Darron D Brewer
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Major Brown, Lieutenet Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Harrison v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01020
Petitioner:
Michael David Harrison
Respondent:
D. Bewer and D. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hill v. Spears et al
as 4:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hill
Defendant:
John H Spears, James E Shipman, Claudia M Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
