Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mattie v. Beaufort County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lewis Mattie
Defendant:
Beaufort County Sheriff's Department, Jason P Prusinowski, S Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester et al v. McKie et al
as 6:2015cv03549
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B McKie, B Wood, J Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. McKie et al
as 6:2015cv03224
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B McKie, M Dir Abbott, Parker Mail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02754
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Satans Brothers & Sisters et al
as 6:2015cv02240
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Satans Brothers & Sisters, Sgt Easterlone, C/O Blassinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01918
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DUARTE v. VINCENT et al
as 2:2013cv02132
Plaintiff:
MARIO JAIME DUARTE
Defendant:
W. VINCENT, T. JENKINS, D. M. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Nielson et al v. School District Five of Lexington & Richland Counties
as 3:2012cv01427
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander Nielson , Freedom From Religion Foundation Inc, The , J Z and others
Defendant:
School District Five of Lexington & Richland Counties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
M v. Clover School District et al
as 0:2012cv00567
Plaintiff:
D M
Defendant:
Clover School District, Clover School District Board of Trustees, Frank Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 6:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
