Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Palmer v. McIntosh
as 1:2023cv09863
Petitioner:
Russell D. Palmer
Respondent:
D. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center
as 23-7260
Defendant / Appellee:
J. LAVALLEY, Employee of CNYPC, CLEVELAND, Employee of CNYPC, D. MCINTOSH, Superintendent of CCF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER and A. FRENYA, Deputy of Security of CCF
Bright v. McIntosh et al
as 9:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Willie Bright
Defendant:
D. McIntosh, Earl Bell, Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. McIntosh
as 9:2023cv00902
Petitioner:
Mark K. McDermott
Respondent:
D. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. NYS BOP Chairman et al
as 1:2023cv04854
Plaintiff:
Leroy Peoples
Defendant:
NYS BOP Chairman, Tina M. Stanford and D. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. McIntosh
as 9:2023cv00476
Petitioner:
Nicholas Chappell
Respondent:
D. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawse v. McIntosh et al
as 9:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hawse
Defendant:
D. McIntosh, J. Bombard, Cymbrak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
as 9:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center, D. McIntosh, C. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen, Kenneth Allen, Kyle Amburgey and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
