Cases 1 - 10 of 57
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
Lucio Ortiz-Contreras
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Harley Lappin , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02268
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00848
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Harley G. Lappin , D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stanley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David W. Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azzara v. Stroda et al
as 3:2011cv01737
Plaintiff:
Paul Azzara
Defendant:
Frank Stroda, R Martinez, Julie Ann Nicklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv02350
Petitioner:
Larry Sinclair Williams
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CONNELL v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2010cv00213
Petitioner:
DENNIS CONNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN YOST, JEFFREY TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michtavi v. Scism et al
as 1:2010cv01399
Plaintiff:
Shemtov Michtavi
Defendant:
W. Scism, J. Martinez, B Feltman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv01009
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric H. Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
