Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Sperry v. Swingle, et al.
as 2:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
Michael Sperry
Defendant:
D. Swingle, Nepomuceno, C. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Rutledge v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-15940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE DARREL RUTLEDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, N. GRANNIS, T. KIMURA and others
Bryan Ransom v. Secretary of California Dept., et al
as 11-15838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, C GREAVES, P. WILSON and others
Michael Sperry v. James Yates, et al
as 11-15623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SPERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES T. YATES, Warden, D. SWINGLE, Chief Medical Office, C. MEDINA, Physician's Assistant and others
Chatman v. Medina
as 2:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
David M. Medina, D. Swingle, J. Nepomuceno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sperry v. Swingle, et al.
as 4:2011cv01090
Plaintiff:
Michael Sperry
Defendant:
D. Swingle, Nepomuceno and C. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Brown, et al
as 2:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Defendant:
J Brown, Director, Calif Dept of Corrections, Director, Division of Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations, et al.
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
Secretary of California Dept. of Corrections & Rehalibations, C. Greaves, P. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Swingle et al
as 2:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ramirez
Defendant:
D. Swingle and D. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2010cv03461
Plaintiff:
Brian Darnell Edwards
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, M. D. McDonald, R.L. Gowes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
