Cases 1 - 10 of 971
Wilson v. D.O.C.
as 3:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Charles Wilson
Defendant:
D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Guadarrama et al
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Samuel Branch
Defendant:
Guadarrama and D.O.C. Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Virginia D.O.C. et al
as 7:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dexter Wells
Defendant:
Virginia D.O.C. and Mississippi D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moultrie v. Red Onion State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison and D.O.C./Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. VA. D.O.C.
as 7:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Darrell Washington, II
Defendant:
VA. D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Brewster v. Aimes et al
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn Brewster
Defendant:
Mataka Aimes, C.O. Yancy, Captain G and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
