Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Christopher Nguyen v. Mary Johnson, et al
as 25-2020
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
Defendant:
MARY T. JOHNSON, ASST DIST. ATT. BERKS COUNTY, PA., BRIAN MCDONALD, ASST. DIST. ATT. BERKS COUNTY, PA., JEFFREY M. REICHART, DETECTIVE, READING, PA, POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Ghee v. McAuliffe
as 9:2023cv00505
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ghee and Jeffrey D. Ghee
Respondent:
N.Y.S. D.O.C.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08352
Defendant:
New York Police Department, D.O.C.S. and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Calvin Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raetz v. New York State D.O.C.S. et al
as 6:2018cv06889
Defendant:
William Querrie and New York State D.O.C.S.
Plaintiff:
Lisa J Raetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrichlow v. Commissioner of the New York State D.O.C.S. et al
as 1:2018cv03222
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Chrichlow
Defendant:
Commissioner of the New York State D.O.C.S., William F. Keyser, Jr., M. Makowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSilva v. John Doe Correctional Officer et al
as 1:2017cv05601
Plaintiff:
Jace DeSilva
Defendant:
John Doe Correctional Officer, Tanisha Mills, John Doe Commissioner of D.O.C.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. N.Y.S. D.O.C.S. Office of Nutritional Services et al
as 1:2014cv08849
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
N.Y.S. D.O.C.S. Office of Nutritional Services and Food Production Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. New York State D.O.C.S.
as 6:2014cv06282
Petitioner:
Segundo Serrano
Respondent:
New York State D.O.C.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. D.O.C.S. et al
as 1:2014cv02608
Plaintiff:
Jason Lopez
Defendant:
D.O.C.S., Cipolini and Burguess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. D.O.C.S. et al
as 1:2014cv02441
Plaintiff:
Jason Lopez
Defendant:
D.O.C.S., Cipolini and Burguess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
