Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08567
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23662
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02579
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caplan v. ROBERT K. HALL, D.P.M., P.A. et al
as 0:2020cv60401
Defendant: BROWARD-COLLIER PROPERTIES, LLC and ROBERT K. HALL, D.P.M., P.A.
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00185
Defendant: Dr. Lucas A. Hennings, M.D., Dr. Jonathan P. O'Neil, M.D., The Board of County Commissioners of the County of El Paso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant: Dr. Lucas A. Hennings, M.D., Dr. Jonathan P. O'Neil, M.D., The Board of County Commissioners of the County of El Paso and others
Plaintiff: Don Kevin Woodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00875
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04389
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61621
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?