Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05088
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21129
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Byrd v. Smith et al
as 9:2023cv00099
Plaintiff: David B Byrd
Respondent: Adrian D. Smith, Korey A. Baugh, Olushola Akarble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv02129
Plaintiff: David B Byrd
Defendant: Adrian D. Smith, Korey A. Baugh, Olushola Akarble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Williams v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00038
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor Williams
Defendant: TDCJ, Christopher Burns, Joshua Hammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7149
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
McGhee v. EWS Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02227
Plaintiff: Camilla McGhee
Defendant: EWS Associates, LLC doing business as Regency Home Care of North Atlanta, Schuetz Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Regency Home Care of North Atlanta, Erich W. Schuetz and others
Johnson v. Raytheon
as 21-11060
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dana Johnson, Relator
Defendant / Appellee: Raytheon Company
DANA JOHNSON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00821
Defendant: CRAIG CHERVERT LONG, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff: DANA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?