Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Presley v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00644
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Presley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Parks et al
as 3:2013cv02116
Plaintiff:
Vincent H Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Parks, Millard Osborn and Dana Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorton et al v. Maryland General Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Denise Thorton , Adrian Miles and Keith Randolph
Defendant:
Maryland General Hospital, Inc. , Dana Lee, M.D. and Harold T. Rowson
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Maryland General Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Lee v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv04454
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pearson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv02212
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Pearson
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coulthard et al v. Trott & Trott, PC et al
as 2:2012cv13601
Plaintiff:
Alan Coulthard and Ann Coulthard
Defendant:
Trott & Trott, PC , David A. Trott , Christopher S Astfalk and others
Warren v. Franklin Parish et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Sean Lawrence Warren
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Franklin Parish, Dana Lee, Susan Choate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serota v. Desert Cab, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01969
Defendant:
Brad Balaban, Dana Lee Strassa Balaban, George Balaban and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald N Serota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BURR v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv66173
Plaintiff:
DANA LEE BURR
Defendant:
NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilliam v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2011cv01388
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Gilliam
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
