Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Flynn v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv13181
Plaintiff: Daniel Flynn
Defendant: Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04782
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Leonard Harris v. Nakita Ross
as 23-6433
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEONARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee: NAKITA ROSS, Parole Agent, CLEVELAND FRIDAY, Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
HICKEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75556
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: DANIEL FLYNN HICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLYNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19470
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: DANIEL FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Alford v. Stephen Carlton, et al
as 18-16088
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS T. ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN S. CARLTON, Elected Official and DANIEL FLYNN, Elected Official
Thomas Alford v. Stephen Carlton, et al
as 18-15857
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS T. ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN S. CARLTON, Elected Official and DANIEL FLYNN
Alford v. Carlton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00463
Plaintiff: Thomas Temple Alford
Defendant: Stephen Carlton and Daniel Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Carlton et al
as 3:2018cv00787
Plaintiff: Thomas Temple Alford
Defendant: Stephen Carlton and Daniel Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whalen v. Flynn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01293
Plaintiff: Daniel Stephen Whalen
Defendant: Daniel Flynn, Ashley Jones, Melissa Fanoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?