Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Riggs et al v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00912
Defendant:
Airbus Helicopters, S.A.S., Scott Booth, Brenda Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Riggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., et al
as 18-16396
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY RIGGS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, for the benefit of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, and PHILIP AND MARLENE UDALL as Next of Kin and Natural Parents of JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW HECKER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, BRENDA HALVORSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
Staci Chester et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01437
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Theresa Metoyer and Robin Berkoff
Not Classified By Court:
Kevan Peters, Patrick S Sweeney, Barbara S Cochran and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive, TJ Maxx of CA, LLC and The TJX Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Staci Chester and Daniel Friedman
Petitioner:
Steven Helfand
Consolidated Defendant:
Marshalls of CA, LLC and Homegoods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Staci Chester, et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., et al
as 18-55786
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-100, inclusive, TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, HOMEGOODS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THERESA METOYER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STACI CHESTER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN and others
Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Staci Chester, et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., et al
as 18-55817
Defendant / Appellee:
TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DOES, 1-100, inclusive, HOMEGOODS, INC. and others
Appellant:
BARBARA S. COCHRAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THERESA METOYER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STACI CHESTER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN and others
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., et al
as 18-16396
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY RIGGS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, for the benefit of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, and PHILIP AND MARLENE UDALL as Next of Kin and Natural Parents of JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW HECKER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, BRENDA HALVORSON and others
Staci Chester, et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., et al
as 18-55817
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STACI CHESTER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, ROBIN BERKOFF and others
Objector - Appellant:
BARBARA S. COCHRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARSHALLS OF CA, LLC and others
Staci Chester, et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., et al
as 18-55787
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STACI CHESTER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, ROBIN BERKOFF and others
Objector - Appellant:
RHADIANTE VAN DE VOORDE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARSHALLS OF CA, LLC and others
Staci Chester, et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., et al
as 18-55788
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STACI CHESTER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, ROBIN BERKOFF and others
Objector - Appellant:
STEVEN F. HELFAND
Defendant - Appellee:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARSHALLS OF CA, LLC and others
Staci Chester, et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., et al
as 18-55786
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STACI CHESTER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, ROBIN BERKOFF and others
Objector - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARSHALLS OF CA, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
