Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Daniel Wesley v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-4639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections
Daniel Wesley v. Bobby Finley
as 10-4506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY FINLEY, Owner of Phases II
WESLEY v. FINLEY
as 2:2010cv01194
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
BOBBY FINLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESLEY v. VARANO et al
as 2:2010cv01166
Petitioner:
DANIEL WESLEY
Respondent:
DAVID A. VARANO and CHRISTINA COCHENOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 10-2955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent and DA ALLEGHENY
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Rozum, et al
as 10-2766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD L. ROZUM, Superintendent for S.C.I. Somerset, ATTY GEN PA, SUPERINTENDENT SCI SOMERSET and others
WESLEY-EL v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00094
Petitioner:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-1895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, DORINA VARNER, NICHOLAS SCHARFF, Medical Director, Bureau of Health Care Services and others
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-4626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Coordinator, NICHOLAS SCHARFF, Medical Director, Bureau of Health Care Services and others
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-4625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Coordinator, NICHOLAS SCHARFF, Medical Director, Bureau of Health Care Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
