Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Brown v. Annucci
as 25-1327
Plaintiff:
ALEX MARTINEZ, TREVOR PRICE, ELIGIDIO LIND and others
Defendant:
Commissioner ANTHONY ANNUCCI, sued in his official capacity, Sgt. B. JOSEPH, JOHN DOE, Officer in Charge, sued in their individual capacity and others
Lush v. Hensle et al
as 2:2025cv00677
Petitioner:
William Stephen Lush, II
Respondent:
Michael E Hensle, Michelle C Schwartz, Christine Decot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Fortino
as 25-913
Defendant:
ELIZABETH S. FORTINO, Director of MHLS, Elizabeth S. Fontino, JOSEPH M. BETAR, Senior Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JONES
Jones v. Tope
as 9:2025cv00294
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Annucci
as 25-430
Plaintiff:
BYRON K. BROWN, CARLOS ARRIAGA, TERRENCE TURNER and others
Defendant:
Commissioner ANTHONY ANNUCCI, sued in his official capacity, C.O. PATRICIA CHUMNEY, DONALD JACKSON and others
Jones v. Black Knight Security, Inc.
as 2:2025cv00246
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jones
Defendant:
Black Knight Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
US v. Cassity Jones
as 25-4084
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CASSITY DANIELLE JONES
JONES v. FORSYTH COUNTY et al
as 1:2025cv00078
Plaintiff:
JACKY DANIEL JONES
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY, FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SHERIFF KIMBOROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Forsyth County et al
as 5:2025ct03019
Plaintiff:
Jacky Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Forsyth County, Forsyth County Detention Center, Sheriff Kimborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Nassau County et al
as 3:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Michale Hoffman
Defendant:
Nassau County, David Gray, Daniel Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
