Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KITLINSKI v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KITLINSKI v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
as 1:2023cv03550
Plaintiff:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI and DAREK KITLINSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KITLINSKI v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KITLINSKI v. U.S. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2022cv02976
Plaintiff:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI and Darek Kitlinski
Defendant:
U.S. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KITLINSKI v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
as 1:2022cv02391
Plaintiff:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Darek Kitlinski v. DOJ
as 19-1621
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Administration As to Privacy Act Claims and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI and LISA M. KITLINSKI
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, OTHER UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AND OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, JOSE FERNANDO RAMON, Special Agent, Office of Professional Responsibility, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Kitlinski et al v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Darek J. Kitlinski and Lisa M. Kitlinski
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Loretta Lynch, Jose Fernando Ramon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
