Cases 1 - 10 of 19
JONES v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2025cv00453
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
PAUL TALBOT, AGNES OPOKU and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
JASON HERSHBERGER, ERIC HORTON, TRAVIS WHITE and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00656
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHA BOWLING, MATTHEW KOPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. David Jones
as 21-6623
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. KOESTER et al
as 1:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINS, STEVE KOESTER and DANIEL KOPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
