Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Stokes v. Adam et al
as 1:2024cv03223
Defendant:
Ms. Adam and Patrice Powell
Plaintiff:
David Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Christopher Pugh v. Robert Fleming, et al
as 24-13596
Defendant:
GERONDA V. CARTER, CLAYTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, VICTOR HILL and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv02733
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Wanda Dallas, Victor Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh and Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Stokes
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Brown
Defendant:
David Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Brown
Defendant:
Jessie Williams, David Stokes and Stanly Shapard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJESKI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11314
Plaintiff:
DAVID STOKES MAJESKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Stokes v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Defendant:
D. Varner, John Wetzel, M. Yost and others
Plaintiff:
David Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
