Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pushkin v. Nussbaum et al
as 2:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. PUSHKIN
Defendant:
Beth R. Nussbaum , RHI Entertainment Inc. , Timothy J. Quinlivan, Esq and others
Cross_claimant:
RHI Entertainment Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Lisa Ardron , Aronsohn Weiner and Salerno, LLC, Kevin L. Bremer, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PUSHKIN v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY(SDSU) et al
as 2:2011cv01984
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. PUSHKIN, DR.
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES - SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY(SDSU), DAVID L. CHICOINE, LAURIE NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pushkin v. Nussbaum et al
as 1:2010cv09212
Plaintiff:
David B. Pushkin
Defendant:
Beth R. Nussbaum, RHI Entertainment Inc., Timothy J. Quinlivan, Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pushkin v. HSBC Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00777
Plaintiff:
David B. Pushkin
Defendant:
HSBC Bank, N.A., Margaret A. Miller, Michelle A. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pushkin v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
as 4:2010cv03246
Plaintiff:
David B. Pushkin
Defendant:
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
