Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Bowen v. Tyson Farms, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
David Bowen
Defendant:
Tyson Farms, Inc., The Hillshire Brands Company and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bowen v. The Clorox Company
as 1:2023cv05584
Plaintiff:
David Bowen
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09379
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOWEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rolfs v. City of Great Falls et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rolfs
Defendant:
City of Great Falls, Cascade County, Lance Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45641
Plaintiff:
RALPH DAVID BOWEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 2:2021cv02519
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 3:2021cv00877
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
