Cases 1 - 10 of 6,250
Texaco Inc. v. Bartel, et al.,
as 1:2018cv02126
Plaintiff:
Texaco Inc.
Defendant:
David C. Peebles and Willard E. Bartel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: Asbestos Products, et al, et al
as 17-3471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. SCHROEDER, CREIGHTON E. MILLER, Administrator of The Estate of Other Wiiliam Schroeder, RICHARD G. WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES KURZ & CO INC.
Bartel et al v. Marine Transport Lines Inc
as 2:2014cv03395
Plaintiff:
Willard E Bartel and David C Peebles
Defendant:
Marine Transport Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bartel v. A.W. Chesterton
as 1:2012mc00124
Plaintiff:
Willard E. Bartel and David C. Peebles
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton
Interested_party:
Humility of Mary Health Partners
MCLAUGHLIN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2012cv30010
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2012cv30009
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BRIETZKE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv68736
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
INSELL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55897
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HALTERMAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55845
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
AMADOR et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58686
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
