Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee:
HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2021cv01677
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Stibert, Stephen Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00888
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Kristen Smith, (f/n/u) Radtke and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. US Collections West Incorporated
as 2:2019cv05895
Plaintiff:
David Dees
Defendant:
US Collections West Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. E-Service Incorporated
as 2:2019cv05210
Plaintiff:
David Dees
Defendant:
E-Service Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. IC System Incorporated
as 2:2019cv05212
Defendant:
IC System Incorporated
Plaintiff:
David Dees
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Price v. Sumner County Courts et al
as 3:2019cv00335
Defendant:
Sumner County Courts, Judge David Dee Gay, Jason Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Phillip Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Resurgent Capital Services LP et al
as 2:2019cv02480
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services LP and LVNV Funding LLC
Plaintiff:
David Dees
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dee et al v. Charles Scwab & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02040
Plaintiff:
David Dee, Madelyn Dee, Richard Dee and others
Defendant:
Charles Scwab & Co., Inc. and Carole A. Childers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
