Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Jenkins v. Boyd
as 2:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
David G. Jenkins
Respondent:
Bert Boyld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Stiefel et al
as 2:2019cv00199
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Co., Travelers Insurance Company and David C Stiefel
Plaintiff:
David G McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. Stiefel et al
as 1:2019cv00319
Defendant:
David C. Stiefel, GEICO General Insurance Co. and Travelers Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
David G. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Admiral Insurance Company v. Florence
as 4:2019cv00037
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
David G. Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sprouse et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al (TWP2)
as 1:2018cv00260
Defendant:
Wilson & Associates, PLLC and Ditech Financial, LLC
Plaintiff:
David G Sprouse and Judy K Sprouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xodus Medical Inc et al v. Prime Medical LLC et al (TWP1)
as 3:2018cv00413
Defendant:
Symmetry Surgical Inc. and Prime Medical LLC
Plaintiff:
Glenn Keilar, Alessio Pigazzi and Xodus Medical Inc
Interested Party:
Donald E. Ziegler
Special Master:
David G. Oberdick
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Nelson v. Warren County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Defendant:
Christy Lee Sturgill, Joseph Caten, Warren County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Nickey Reese, Meigabelle Leigh Anna South, Clarence Kelly Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Submar, Inc v. Bray et al
as 2:2018cv02647
Plaintiff:
Submar, Inc
Defendant:
David G Bray, Bray, Skelton and Associates, Inc and The Bray Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
