Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GARCIA v. USA
as 1:2016cv00450
Petitioner:
DANIAL DAVID GARCIA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garcia et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17035
Plaintiff:
Esther Garcia and David Garcia
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv15695
Plaintiff:
Olga Garcia and David Garcia
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15054
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garcia and David Garcia
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06664
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Garcia and David Garcia
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Roberts
as 1:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
B.J. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Ismael Ramo
as 11-4672
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISMAEL FELIPE RAMOS, a/k/a Tony, a/k/a Ismael Felife Ramos, a/k/a Hector David Garcia-Viera
McGirt v. FCI Estill et al
as 6:2008cv02882
Plaintiff:
Rona Paul McGirt
Defendant:
FCI Estill, Ven Eneje, Jackie Bush and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eugene Cooper v. Matthew Hamidullah
as 08-6674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE E. COOPER, a/k/a Eugene E. Cooper
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, in his individual capacity and DAVID GARCIA, in his individual capacity
Cooper v. Hamidullah et al
as 4:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Eugene Cooper
Defendant:
Matthew B Hamidullah and David Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
