Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Rigney v. Hamilton
as 4:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Rex Rigney
Defendant:
Doe and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hamilton v. Ables et al
as 2:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
L. Ables, D. Clays, P. Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Clays et al
as 2:2023at00651
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
D. Clays, P. Covello and L. Ables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Orr
as 23-30270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Hamilton
Defendant / Appellee:
John Orr, Trent Barton, Luke Rheams and others
(PC) Hamilton v. Ables et al
as 2:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
L. Ables, David Clays, Patrick Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hamilton v. Ables et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
L. Ables, David Clays, Patrick Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hamilton v. People of The State of California et al
as 2:2021cv03446
Petitioner:
David Hamilton
Respondent:
County of Los Angeles and People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Orr et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Trent Barton, John Orr, Omar Walker and others
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
