Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Davis v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00826
Defendant:
E. Miller, Joel Barrows, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Vernon Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah WeirIn re: Elijah Weir
as 21-1955
Respondent:
BARRY R. SMITH, "Superintendant" at SCI-Houtzdale facility, B. J. SOLOMAN, "Deputy-Superintendant" at SCIHoutzdale, JOEL BARROWS, "Major Officer" at SCI-Houtzdale and others
Petitioner:
In re: ELIJAH WEIR
Machicote v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv01315
Defendant:
David J. Close, Dr. Walmer, M.D., Bobby Jo Salamon and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Machicote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01748
Defendant:
Major Barrows, John Wetzel, Captain Acey and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01747
Defendant:
Tom Wolfe, Keefe, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01930
Defendant:
C.O. M. Miller, P.S.S.-B Dubler, HEX Shawn Wiggins and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOZER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. BOOZER, SR.
Defendant:
GARRY SMITH, DAVID J. CLOSE, FOT CENTRALIZED SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boozer v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv02269
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Boozer, Sr.
Defendant:
Garry Smith, David J. Close, FOT Centralized Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNO v. WOJUOLA et al
as 3:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BURNO
Defendant:
MOBOLAJI WOJUOLA, C. TIM MILLER, DAVID J. CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas Pracht v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 16-3169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS ALBERT PRACHT
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KENNETH CAMERON, WUJUOLA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
