Cases 1 - 10 of 27
WALKER v THOMAS CONWAY et al
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Thomas Conway, David Jury, Larry Burchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v Thomas Conway et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Thomas Conway, David Jury, Larry Burchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCall v. USA
as 3:2022cv01656
Petitioner:
Michael David McCall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26963
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DAVID MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 2:2020md02973
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., CENTOCOR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Thomas, Beatrice Bridges, CAROL HARDY and others
Special Master:
HON. ROBERT L. POLIFRONI and HON. MARK FALK, USMJ (RET.)
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE MCMILLIN and CHERYL NALEFSKI
Petitioner:
STEVE GOURAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04739
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael McCall
as 20-10959
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael David McCall
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
