Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Clarence Alexander v. David Bernhardt
as 20-35047
3Rd Party Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, in his official capacity
Plaintiff:
GWITCHYAA ZHEE CORPORATION and GWICHYAA ZHEE GWICH'IN TRIBAL GOVERNMENT
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
DEMETRIE ALEXANDER, (Dacho) and CLARENCE ALEXANDER
Alexander v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01490
Petitioner:
Demetri Alexander
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demetri Alexander v. NDOC, et al
as 17-15599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRI ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Demetri Alexander v. Gary Dutton
as 17-15529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRI ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY DUTTON
Demetri v. NDOC et al
as 2:2016cv00517
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Aranas and NDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. NDOC et al
as 2:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Dwayne Deal, Faliszek, Timothy Filson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. NDOC et al
as 2:2015cv02485
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Dante Famy, Karen A Gedney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. NDOC et al
as 2:2015cv02246
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Mitchell Hicks-Moses, NDOC and Romchisel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. NDOC et al
as 2:2015cv02244
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Dr Hanf, Dante Famy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James G. Cox, Shannon Moyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
