Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-7036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Monica Charles v. District of Columbia Dept.
as 15-7138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Monica A. Charles
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services
MONK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01574
Plaintiff:
LINETTE MONK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES OF D.C. DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH REHABILITATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LAYNE v. DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH REHABILITATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2014cv00866
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAYNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH REHABILITATION SERVICES and FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MBA-JONAS et al v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2012cv01748
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MBA-JONAS and CAROL EDWARDS
Defendant:
TORAIN DEVON ADAMS, GREGORY ADAMS , JANE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
JEFFERIES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv01159
Plaintiff:
NARDYNE JEFFERIES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , VINCENT GRAY , DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH REHABILITATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
